Friendly fire

From Includipedia, the inclusionist encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Friendly fire or non-hostile fire, a term originally adopted by the United States military, is fire from allied or friendly forces, as opposed to fire coming from enemy forces or enemy fire. A friendly fire incident (fratricide), is when friendly forces or materiel are attacked and damaged by friendly fire [1] which may be deliberate (e.g. incorrectly identifying the target as the enemy), or accidental (e.g. missing the enemy and hitting "friendlies"). Friendly fire is one kind of collateral damage. The term friendly fire is frequently used as a euphemism in military culture and frequently seen as an oxymoron.

The British military refer to these incidents as blue on blue,[2] which derives from military exercises where NATO forces were identified by blue pennants, hence "blue", and Warsaw Pact forces were identified by orange pennants. Unofficially, the term 'own goal' is also used.

Contents

[edit] Fratricide versus Friendly Fire

Some prefer the term fratricide over friendly fire, because they deem the latter to be an unfitting euphemism exemplified by the aphorism "there's nothing friendly about getting shot by your own side."[1] However, the origin and purpose of the term is as a simple distinction to enemy fire.[citation needed] Both terms serve only to identify the source of an attack as coming from enemy (hostile) or friendly forces and not the nature of an attack.

The term amicicide (killing of a friend) has also been used in the same manner as fratricide (Shrader 1982).

[edit] Classification

Friendly fire incidents fall roughly into two categories. The first classification is fog of war which generically describes friendly fire incidents in unintentional circumstances due to the confusion inherent in warfare. The second classification is murder where friendly fire incidents are premeditated. During the Vietnam War, this was known as “fragging.”[1]

Fog of war incidents fall roughly into two classes:[1]

Errors of position
Where fire aimed at enemy forces accidentally ends up hitting one's own. Such incidents were relatively common during the First and Second World Wars, where troops fought in proximity to each other and targeting was relatively inaccurate. As weapons have become more accurate in recent times, this class of incidents has become less common but still occurs, the most recent and highly publicized example being Operation Enduring Freedom, wherein a laser-guided bomb was mistakenly called in on friendly forces, causing heavy casualties.
Errors of identification
Where friendly troops are mistakenly attacked in the belief that they are enemy. Highly mobile battles, and battles involving troops from many nations are more likely to cause this kind of incident as evidenced by incidents in the first Gulf War, or the shooting down of a British aircraft by a U.S. Patriot battery during the Invasion of Iraq.[3] According to CNN, the best-known case of such an accident was the death of Pat Tillman[4]

[edit] History

Two French regiments accidentally attacking each other during the Battle of Fleurus led to the habit of attaching a white scarf to the flags of the regiments from 1690 - white being the colour of the kings of France.[citation needed]

[edit] Friendly fire in the U.S. military

The Americian Air Force is well noted for many friendly fire incidents in all wars including WWII and Vietnam. Pentagon estimates of U.S. friendly fire deaths, as a percentage of total U.S. deaths:

[edit] Use in British culture

Due to the number of UK personnel killed by U.S. forces, in Britain the term 'friendly fire' is used in a semi-ironic way to imply U.S. Military incompetence [6] [7][8] It is a frequent source of satirical humour. Examples include

  • The third (2005) series of Monkey Dust, in which a British military vehicle in Afghanistan is targeted by an American pilot, despite a large Union Flag on its roof (the sole surviving soldier then runs through a series of British stereotypes, such as pouring a cup of tea and donning a bowler hat, but is bombed again, anyway)
  • 19 October 2006 edition of Mock the Week, host Dara Ó Briain noted that British soldiers in Iraq were being, "shot at on a daily basis, although obviously it'll get much safer when the Americans leave and it's only the Iraqis firing at them."
  • In a 2007 edition of the motoring programme Top Gear, presenter Jeremy Clarkson said he was quite safe during a simulated "duel" between a Lotus Exige and a Westland WAH-64 Apache attack helicopter because the pilots, "being British, not American, don't shoot their allies."
  • A "joke" in the dialogue of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas - developed by Rockstar North, based in Scotland - the main character, CJ, is assigned by a government agent Mike Toreno to steal a military jet off an aircraft carrier. The player is soon pursued by other jet planes, aimed at shooting him down. Mike Toreno hearing this mocks the remark that the enemy pilots make and tries to reassure that they will not shoot CJ down, remarking you're not a British tank.

[edit] Incidents and persons

Template:Refimprove

[edit] Distinction

Friendly fire is fire that was intended to do harm to the enemy: a death resulting from a negligent discharge is not considered "friendly fire".

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

  1. a b c d Regan, G. Backfire: a history of friendly fire from ancient warfare to the present day. Robson Books, 2002.
  2. ^ http://www.publications.parliament.uk/cgi-bin/newhtml_hl?DB=semukparl&STEMMER=en&WORDS=blue%20on%20friendly%20fire&ALL=%22friendly%20fire%22&ANY=&PHRASE=%22blue%2don%2dblue%22%20%22%22friendly%22%20%22fire%22%22&CATEGORIES=&SIMPLE=&SPEAKER=&COLOUR=red&STYLE=s&ANCHOR=muscat_highlighter_first_match&URL=/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmpubacc/uc990-i/uc99002.htm#muscat_highlighter_first_match
  3. ^ The Economist Closing in on Baghdad March 25 2003
  4. ^ http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/07/01/afghan.probe/index.html U.S. military probes soldier's death
  5. ^ http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/04/18/afghanistan.canada/
  6. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,926237,00.html] [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,931992,00.html
  7. ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/01/06/nirq06.xml
  8. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6468391.stm
  9. ^ This figure comes from a 1921 book by an artillery expert, General Percin, called Le massacre de notre infanterie, 1914-1918. The book claims 75,000 French soldiers were casualties of their own artillery. Percin supports his claim with hundreds of battlefield correspondence from all parts of the Western Front.
  10. ^ http://www.german-navy.de/kriegsmarine/articles/feature4.html
  11. ^ http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/H/history/a-b/bader.html
  12. ^ http://www.gunplot.net/vietnam/hobartvietnam.html
  13. ^ http://www.gunplot.net/vietnam/hobartvietnamandpcf19.html
  14. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/photo_gallery/3244305.stm
  15. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/north_yorkshire/6187414.stm
  16. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2886715.stm
  17. ^ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article2062516.ece
  18. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6346901.stm
  19. ^ http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070612/ap_on_re_as/afghan_violence
  20. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6962071.stm
  21. ^ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3070875.ece

[edit] References

  • Shrader, Charles R. Amicicide: the problem of friendly fire in modern war, University Press of the Pacific, 2005. ISBN 1-4102-1991-7
  • Regan, G. More Military Blunders. Carlton Books, 2004.

[edit] External links

fr:Tir ami it:Fuoco amico he:אש כוחותינו nl:Eigen vuur pl:Friendly fire ru:Дружественный огонь

Personal tools