Federalist Society

From Includipedia, the inclusionist encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg
The Federalist Society logo, depicting the silhouette of James Madison's bust

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, most frequently called simply the Federalist Society, began at Yale Law School, Harvard Law School, and the University of Chicago Law School in 1982 as a student organization that challenged what its members perceived as the orthodox American liberal ideology found in most law schools. The Federalist Society states that it is founded on the principles that "the state exists to preserve freedom," that "the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution," and that the duty of the judicial branch is "to say what the law is, not what the law should be."[1]

The Society currently has chapters at approximately 180 United States law schools, including all of those U.S. News & World Report ranks among the top 20.[2] The Society also boasts a membership of over 20,000 practicing attorneys (organized as "alumni chapters" within the Society's "Lawyers Division") in sixty cities.[3] The Federalist Society also serves as a parent organization for conservatives and libertarians who are interested in the current state of the legal order. Its headquarters are in Washington, D.C.

Contents

[edit] Background

The Society’s name is a reference to the Federalist Papers. These were published as a series of articles intended to explain the new Constitution to the residents of New York state and persuade them to ratify it. A compilation of the Papers, called The Federalist, was published in 1788. The articles were secretly written under the pseudonym "Publius" by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. Hamilton wrote 51 of the Federalist papers, Jay five, and Madison 29.

The Society also looks to Federalist Paper Number 78 for an articulation of the virtue of judicial restraint, as written by Alexander Hamilton: "It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy, may substitute their own pleasure to the constitutional intentions of the legislature.... The courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT, the consequence would equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body."

Due to the strong influence of Madison on the Society’s philosophy, the Federalist Society considers Madison to be its patriarch—hence the use of Madison’s silhouette in the Society’s official logo. Madison is generally credited as the father of the Constitution and became the fourth President of the United States.

[edit] Funding

The Federalist Society is funded by member dues and by grants. It has received over $12 million in grants from non-profit foundations, such as the Earhart, Bradley, Simon, and Olin foundations, as well as the Carthage, Koch, and Scaife Foundations.[4]

[edit] Aims and membership

The Society seeks to promote the ideology set forth in its "Statement of Principles" through its activities. In working to achieve these goals, the Society has created a network of intellectuals that extends to all levels of the legal community. The Student Division has more than 5,000 law students as members and, through the national office's network of legal experts, the Society provides speakers for differing viewpoints at law school events. The activities of the Student Division are complemented by the activities of the Lawyers Division, which comprises more than 20,000 legal professionals, and the Faculty Division, which includes many in the academic legal community.

Under United States Code, the Federalist Society is legally organized as a tax-exempt nonprofit organization and is expressly forbidden[5] to engage in "political and lobbying activities".[6]

Members of the society have debated the abolition of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, limiting the power of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and other agencies, limiting the reach of gender equity laws (Title IX) and voting rights laws, and expanded powers of war-time presidents. The organization also hosts panels discussing recent Supreme Court decisions, the constitutionality of school vouchers, and the scope of the commerce clause.[4] The Federalist Society does not officially lobby and does not litigate cases.

The Federalist Society is an organization that seeks to debate constitutional issues and public policy questions, a commitment which extends to inviting speakers who do not agree with the society's principles; past invitees include Justice Stephen Breyer and law professor Alan Dershowitz, as trenchant opponents of the Federalist Society's goals as could be imagined. UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh explains this openness to dissenting voices by saying that "we think that a fair debate between us and our liberal adversaries will win more converts for our positions than for the other side’s."[7]

"Dedicated to reforming the current legal order," the Federalist Society hopes to transform the American legal system by developing and promoting conservative positions and influencing who will become judges, top government officials, and decision-makers.[4] The Federalist Society’s guide to forming and running a chapter of the society claims that the organization “creates an informal network of people with shared views which can provide assistance in job placement.”[4]

Federalist Society members helped to encourage President Bush’s decision to terminate the American Bar Association’s nearly half-century-old monopoly on rating judicial nominees' qualifications for office. Since the Eisenhower administration, the American Bar Association has provided the service to presidents of both parties and the nation by vetting the qualifications of those under consideration for lifetime appointment to the federal judiciary. The process has been accused by some (including the Federalist Society) of having a liberal bias.[8][9][10] For example, the ABA gave Ronald Reagan's judicial nominees Richard Posner and Frank H. Easterbrook low "qualified/not qualified" ratings; later, the ABA gave Bill Clinton judicial nominees with similar resumes "well qualified" ratings.[11] Meanwhile, Judges Posner and Easterbrook have gone on to become the two most highly-cited judges in the federal appellate judiciary.[12]

[edit] Members

The Society has many prominent conservative members including:[citation needed]

The Society also has many prominent libertarians who are members and frequent speakers at Society events, such as:[citation needed]

Other members include:[citation needed]

While not necessarily members, several figures in the public eye have written for Federalist Society publications:[13]

Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts was reported to be a member of the Federalist Society during the 2005 confirmation process, but Roberts's membership status was never definitively established. Deputy White House press secretary Dana Perino said Roberts "has no recollection of ever being a member."[14] The Washington Post later located the Federalist Society Lawyers' Division Leadership Directory, 1997-1998, which listed Roberts as a member of the Washington chapter steering committee.[15] Membership in the Society is not a necessary condition for being listed in the leadership directory.[15] Like other private organizations, including the NAACP and the National Rifle Association, the Federalist Society does not publish a membership list or otherwise disclose the identity of its members, preferring instead to let members publicly identify themselves with the Society if they so choose.

The Bush administration has nominated a number of Society members to federal District and Appeals courts.[4]

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] References

  1. ^ About Us. The Federalist Society. Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
  2. ^ Template:Cite news
  3. ^ Our Background. The Federalist Society. Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
  4. a b c d e Right Wing Organizations. People For The American Way (May, 2006). Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
  5. ^ Exemption Requirements. IRS. Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
  6. ^ Political and Lobbying Activities. IRS. Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
  7. ^ Volokh, Eugene (June 3, 2001). Our Flaw? We’re Just Not Liberals. Washington Post. Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
  8. ^ Batkins, Sam (2004-08-12). ABA Retains Little Objectivity in Nomination Process. Center for Individual Freedom. Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  9. ^ Template:Cite news
  10. ^ ABA Ratings of Judicial Nominees. ABA Watch. Federalist Society (1996-07). Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  11. ^ Lott, Jr., John R. (January 25, 2006). Pulling Rank. New York Times. Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
  12. ^ Choi, Stephen; Gulati, Mitu (2003). "Who Would Win a Tournament of Judges (Draft)". Boalt Working Papers in Public Law (19): 96. University of California. Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  13. ^ White Papers. The Federalist Society. Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
  14. ^ Lane, Charles (July 21, 2005). Federalist Affiliation Misstated. The Washington Post. Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
  15. a b Lane, Charles (July 25, 2005). Roberts Listed in Federalist Society '97-98 Directory. The Washington Post. Retrieved on 2007-08-25.
Personal tools