Debunker

From Includipedia, the inclusionist encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

A Debunker is an individual who strongly believes that certain claims are false, exaggerated, unscientific or pretentious and therefore discredits and exposes them.[1] Topics that many debunkers focus on include U.F.O.s, claimed paranormal phenomena, conspiracy theories, alternative medicine, religion, research outside mainstream science or pseudoscientific subjects. The term debunker is applied when a person functions as an activist and performs research, writes articles, gives speeches, conducts seminars, or engages in other activities with the specific intent of disproving what the debunker believes to be a dubious, bizarre, or abnormal claim, and hopefully conclusively disproving the validity of the event and/or object.

As a slang term, debunking is the act of disproving a proposal or theory, generally in an academic or scientific sense.

Contents

[edit] Etymology

The term debunk originated in 1923, when American novelist William Woodward (1874-1950) used it to mean to "take the bunk out of things." Often the term "debunkery" is not limited to arguments about scientific validity. It can also be used in a more general sense at attempts to discredit any opposing point of view, such as that of a political opponent. "Debunkify", a variant of debunk, has also recently been introduced into the lexicon. The word is a marketing/advertising term coined by the Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation, and is associated with debunking the myths associated with tobacco use.[2]

[edit] Criticism

Many debunkers are rather controversial because they have strong opinions and can be vocal about things such as religion and pseudoscience, which may offend people. Some, such as Marcello Truzzi (who self-identified as a skeptic), maintain that some debunkers are excessively and dishonestly skeptical, and thus not true skeptics but "pseudoskeptics". According to Truzzi, genuine skeptics are neutral or agnostic, often critical of new claims, but not vehemently opposed to them. They want better evidence. In contrast, pseudoskeptics are simply deniers with an agenda and often use unscientific arguments to debunk what they oppose. According to Truzzi, true skepticism would recognize the need for better evidence, but not actively oppose, ridicule, or discourage further investigation into any subject by serious and qualified researchers.[3][4]

[edit] Well-known debunkers

[edit] Organizations

[edit] Quotes

  • Remember: a thing cannot be "debunked" unless it is filled with bunk to begin with! [6]
  • To debunk is to unmask, to put straight, to clarify, to remove false opinions, to correct, to free from illusion. Template:Ref harvard.

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Debunker. Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved on 2007-09-26.
  2. ^ Debunkify. Ohio tobacco prevention foundation. Retrieved on 2007-09-26.
  3. ^ On Pseudo-Skepticism A Commentary by Marcello Truzzi by Marcello Truzzi in the Zetetic Scholar, #12-13, 1987
  4. ^ http://www.anomalist.com/commentaries/pseudo.html On Pseudo-Skepticism A Commentary by Marcello Truzzi Read the article here
  5. ^ Jia, Hepeng (2006-02-03). Out to debunk: China's 'science police' (txt). Retrieved on 2007-09-26.
  6. ^ http://www.debunker.com/ Debunker.com

[edit] References

[edit] External articles

Look up debunk in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

fr:Debunking ko:디벙커 pt:Desenganador

Personal tools